Improving the Performance of Project & Facility Management Division with the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard

Authors

  • Armina Immawati Universitas Mercu Buana Author
  • Agustinus Hariadi Djoko Purwanto Universitas Mercu Buana Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70550/joseb.v2i3.60

Keywords:

Cost Budget Plan, Cost Control, SBSC, AHP, PDCA

Abstract

Objectives: The Project & Facility Management Division of PT XYZ identified an issue as a gap between the cost budget plan and actual project execution, resulting in additional effort beyond the set limits. To address this issue, this study employs a Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC) approach based on the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA).
Methodology: This research employs quantitative methods with AHP that used to determine the priority weights of SBSC perspectives and indicators to enhance division performance. Meanwhile, qualitative analysis is conducted through Focus Group Discussion and fishbone diagram analysis to identify root causes. The PDCA methodology is then implemented to monitor and improve the effectiveness of the applied strategies.
Findings: Evaluation of work programs that can be carried out in 2025 focuses on aspects of standardization, time management, process documentation, human resource development, and external management to support project success.
Conclusion: The study results indicate that the customer perspective holds the highest weight in SBSC (0.309), followed by the internal business process perspective (0.255), learning and growth (0.235), and financial (0.201). Several strategies are proposed to improve division performance, including digitizing the cost budgeting process, strengthening supply chain risk management, enhancing human resource capacity, and implementing a real-time evaluation system. This study contributes to improving operational efficiency and optimizing resource allocation within the company that aligned with SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Agustinus Hariadi Djoko Purwanto, Universitas Mercu Buana
    Universitas Mercu Buana

References

Baali, Y., Saerang, A. A., Anwar, U. A., Widiana, I. N., Sudirjo, F., Herdiansyah, D., . . . Hati, R. P. (2023). Manajemen Kualitas. Padang: Get Press Indonesia.

BMHS. (2023.). ADVANCING AN EXCELLENT HEALTHCARE ECOSYSTEM. https://www.bmhs.co.id/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Annual%20Report%20 -%20PT%20Bundamedik%20Tbk%202023.pdf

Chalmeta, R., Mollar, M., & Peris, G. (2020). Experiences in the development of a sustainable scorecard for enterprise sustainability course. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2020.0083

Hamied, M. S. A., & Elbagoury, A. (2023). Balanced scorecards: proposed framework for application at the local system level insights from international experiences. Review of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1108/REPS-08-2020-0109

Liew, E., Koh, S., Kwok, A., Poh, Y., & French, J. (2021). Technology perception and productivity among physicians in the new norm post-pandemic: a dynamic capabilities perspective., 75-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4126-5_5

Lu, M. T., Chang, S. C., & Huang, L. H. (2022). USING THE SUSTAINABILITY-BALANCED SCORECARDFOR ASSESSING SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES OF THE GREEN ENERGY COMPANIES. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 28(2), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2022.16334

Kumar, S., Lim, W. M., Sureka, R., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Bamel, U. (2023). Balanced scorecard: trends, developments, and future directions. In Review of Managerial Science. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00700-6

Meredith, J.R., Mantel, S.J. (2007). Project Management A Managerial Approach Seventh Edition. University of Cincinnati : John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Mio, C., Costantini, A., & Panfilo, S. (2021). Alat pengukuran kinerja untuk bisnis berkelanjutan: tinjauan literatur sistematis tentang penggunaan Balanced Scorecardkeberlanjutan. Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan dan Manajemen Lingkungan, 29(2), 367-384. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2206

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Syafitri, F. (2023). Post pandemic in indonesia: economic development challenges and policy recommendations for indonesia., 25-31. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-328-3_4

T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process: Second Edition, New York: Springer, 2012.

Verawati, H. (2020). The Balanced Scorecard Design Proposal as an Approach in Performance-Based Budgeting at the Cabinet Secretariat of the Republic of Indonesia. 3rd International Conference on Research in Business, Management and Economics (27-29 November). Retrieved from https://www.dpublication.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/18-318.pdf

Downloads

Published

2025-07-22